Affirmative Action Essay

Affirmative Action has remained unrivaled of the nearly controversial favorable issues of our time. Aggressive non-discrimi province was the original intention, barely it soon became clear that merely promising non to discriminate would have little effect on the racial bias in our golf-club. My own view was first formed by my father and influenced by the conservative environment in which I lived. Since then, I have experienced a much broader view of American society. I have heard worldly concerny a(prenominal) different opinions on favorable spotion from all aspects of our culture and I have changed my mind.The roots of optimistic put to death can be traced back to the passage of the 1964 Civil Rights Act, where legislation redefined public and private behavior. The act states that to discriminate in private is legal, but anything regarding business or public discrimination is illegal (Affirmative 13). on that point are two instances when opposing favourable natural turn might seem the wrong thing to do. First, the magnificence of the cause to help others. Second, plausive action was a great starter for equation in the add place.The case against positive action ests heavily on myth and misunderstanding, and following illustrates that an absence of affirmatory action in todays society will only reinforce racial injustice. Myth 1 The only itinerary to create a color-blind society is to adopt color-blind policies. Although this statement sounds thoughtlessly possible, the reality is that colorblind policies often put racial minorities at a disadvantage. For instance, color-blind seniority system tends to encourage white workers against job layoffs, because senior employees are usually white (Ezorsky, 1991). Myth 2 Affirmative action has not succeeded in increasing female and minority representation.Several studies have documented important gains in racial and gender equality as a direct result of affirmative action (Bowen & Bok, 1998 Murr ell & Jones, 1996). For example, affirmative action has helped five million minorities and six million whites and minority women to be promoted in the workplace. The effect of the affirmative action program previously documented show important gains in racial and gender equality according to, Roger Clegg of the Academic Search Premier. America is known as the land of prospect. However, it became evident that opport agreement was only available to white men.Later, laws were passed to ensure equal opport angiotensin converting enzyme regardless of race, sex, and religion. These affirmative action laws were sterilise in place by our government with the intent of righting the social evil known as impairment but in doing so, they created a monster. Affirmative action has become an ineffective, outdated, and socially harmful policy that is enfeebling our great nation. Should Affirmative Action be mended or ended? Affirmative action is an attempt to correct unequal distribution of ben efits (status, income and wealth, power and authority,) and burdens associated with ethnic and gender differences.When we become citizens of this nation, at birth or otherwise, we demand a warranty. That warranty is supposed to be honored by every government franchise in every village and hamlet of this nation. It is non transferable, and it is good for the life of the vehicle. We are guaranteed the right to vote, the right to due process the right to be free, not to be enslaved, as long as we conduct ourselves in accordance of rights with the laws of our nation and the right to equal treatment under the law, regardless of our race, color, sex, religion national origin. These are rights which adhere to us as individuals, not as members of a group.Affirmative action has its roots in that love life for fairness. When President Lyndon Johnson explained affirmative action to the nation, it is significant that he said, You cant bring a man to the starting line who has been hobbled by chains and expect him to run the race competitively. Fairness dictated that the nation pursue affirmative action to compensate black Americans for the wrong that had been done. Affirmative action was a proficiency for jump-starting the process of integrating black Americans into the fabric of American society, for changing the culture of America from an exclusive society into an inclusive one.I will never abandon my faith that America can become Ronald Reagans shining city on the hill, a society in which a persons gender or race or ethnic background are irrelevant in the transactions of their government. allow us not mourn the death of affirmative action. or else, let us proclaim our belief that the sense of smell of equal opportunity, which affirmative action engendered, has become a permanent fixture of Americas social, economic, and policy-making landscape. Let us have faith in our own sense of fair play and maintain affirmative action alive.Efficiency is important to the success of any machine, including economic machines. Affirmative action increases diversity, but it does so at a cost. The cost is that it promotes racism indirectly by focusing on differences. I have a remedy idea. The main goal behind affirmative action is to promote unity and efficiency. So the question is what is the best way to do that? One way, is to simply provide unity incentives. Instead of punishing qualified white males, we should instead provide incentives to white males to promote diversity and unity.The best way to do this is to use the tax system. Greater unity should mean lower taxes, meaning tax incentives to anyone who promotes unity. The to a greater extent women you hire, the lower your taxes. The more minorities you hire, the lower your taxes. If your business is diverse according to guidelines, you should actually be able to pass water money for promoting diversity and unity. Affirmative action is wrong you should not punish qualified employees. You should in stead retaliate shareholders, CEOs, and the corporation itself for doing what is rational, and in the best interest of the bottom line.So one replacement for affirmative action could be unity tax deductions. Another replacement for affirmative action could be unity impute, where individuals who choose to run their business or give to charities which promote unity, can actually receive credits for doing so and abolish affirmative action. That great American pastimebaseballis a reminder of the long suit of our passion for fairness as we encourage the crowd to kill the umpire if he makes what we consider an un gamboling call.As we drive home at the end of the day, our hands gripping the steering wheel, our bumper kissing the one ahead, when to our right a vehicle speeds along the curb and merges ahead of us at the moment when an chess opening appears, our passion for fairness surfaces. The protrusion of one of our fingers signals our belief that one of the rules of fairness has bee n violated. In every sport I can think ofbaseball, basketball, football, tennisone is expected to play between the white lines. To do otherwise is unfair and carries a penalty.The problem with affirmative action is that it singles out a occurrence ethnic subsection of the lower discriminate, while leaving many deserving people behind wholly because of their heritage. Instead, this society should focus on raising the bar for all members of the lower and middle class who adjure to educate themselves and better their economic, intellectual and cultural positions in life. We should do this by providing more lower class young adults of all colors and creeds with inexpensive higher education. I strongly believe that only when affirmative action is unnecessary and outmoded should we abolish it.We should not destroy our current solution without creating a newer, better one. In conclusion, affirmative action policies, as they exist right now, are ineffective, outdated, hypocritical, and harmful. On the other hand, affirmative action is the best thing since peanut butter, where all people of all race can wonder a good sandwich. Though all of these may be argued well by both sides, this detain point is indisputable. Affirmative Action, no matter how it is explained, rationalized, justified, or disguised, will still be the center of social issues in our time and the time to come.